Response to Intervention
Identification and Evaluation
Since provisions of the reauthorized Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) took place after July 1, 2005. The scale of identification and evaluation changed for children with learning disabilities into and out of the special education programs. Experts began questioning the methods and inconsistencies throughout various districts and states that lead to believe that many children identified as learning disabled (LD) should not have been qualified under the discrepancy model of assessment. Schools who qualified children who had a sever discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability may have caused harm to students as it results in delaying intervention until the student’s achievement is sufficiently low. Once placed in the Special Education program, research has shown an inability to achieve in such a restrictive environment compared to those who have been serviced in there general education class or Least restrictive Environment (LRE). This new model called Response to intervention (RTI) suggest that schools provide evidence of interventions in the general education class before moving a child to a more restrictive environment such as Special Ed.
Over the past few years that the scale of identification and Evaluation of children into special Ed, some educator are struggling to cope with changes of No Child Left Behind. No Child Left Behind Laws have made it possible for all children to receive free and appropriate education. The new (RTI) Response to Intervention model suggests that teachers provide evidence of interventions in the general education class before moving to a special education environment. Because of this, we have to define appropriate education. Appropriate education is different for each child and leaves room for question. Many of the questions are what types of assessments are used in various districts around the region. Do they discriminate based on social economics? Are they consistent in transitioning from Elementary school to Middle School and on up to High School. Parents are concerned as well asking; Is my child going to be made fun of in this program? Will he be with general Ed students?
These questions are important because laws have been passed and schools have been sued for not providing an appropriate education and others have been placed in special education classes unjustly based on behavior rather than proper evaluation and assessment. Children are to be given every opportunity to succeed as possible.




April 5th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
I agree children have the right to be given proper evaluation. Its sad that some children slip through the cracks and some are misdignosed.I think that its the schools fault that they don’t have the appropriateeducation for the children they are providing for not the laws.
September 9th, 2009 at 2:47 pm
I think that the RTI models, when implemented thoroughly, can be better evaluation tools for students who might be special ed. There seems to be too many flaws in the current testing system, as well as too much racial and socioeconomic bias.
October 12th, 2009 at 9:45 am
i don’t blame the school much, simply because there may not be too many laws that protect the education of special ed students as well as special ed teachers. but i do believe that schools should do whatever it takes to provide this students with sufficient tools that well help them achieve their full potential. In order for this students to reach their full potential they need to be given a proper evaluation that suits each individual.
November 2nd, 2009 at 11:14 am
children should be able to receive all the necessary educational tools. sometimes children keep just barely passing and sometimes these children need a different type of environment. Children need to be evaluated in various different ways to show their potential in order to not let the cultural or language barriors determine the incompetency in the classroom. i believe the schools need more tools to keep the children from “sliping through the cracks”
April 20th, 2010 at 11:09 am
Just as all the others i feel that children do need to be properly assessed and examined when it comes to testing. Also think we need to take into consideration that children and adults special or not all have different learning styles and needs, so this should also be put into consideration when we are trying to assess children for testing, intervention, etc.